Jesus is willing to make an amazing exchange for us – one few are willing to believe or accept, because it is not the human way of doing things. God has decided to grant us eternity with Him in Heaven if we give Him our failures, our sins, our mistakes, the things we are most ashamed of, the things we did that hurt others or ourselves, the things others did that hurt us, our personal pains, our heartaches, our cuts and bruises, our warts, our dissatisfactions, our boredoms, our illnesses, our mental and emotional anguish, our losses, our pride, our hate, our lack of faith. In trade for these burdens, God offers peace, patience, love, self-control – eternity with Him and eternal joy – forgiveness and mercy – amazing grace.
This offer is not from the church, or other ‘good people’, or any government or human kingdom. It cannot be enforced or denied apart from the God who created it. It cannot be bought, sold, traded, or gifted. It is not a deserved offer in any sense of something God owes us. Nor is it that God covets these painful, shameful, and filthy things. This offer is because of love. Like a parent who sacrifices for their child, or a friend for a friend.
There is no greater love than this: that a person would lay down his life for the sake of his friends.
– John 15:13
We each need this offer more than we need those things we would hold onto instead. Let go, let it go – and come to the Lord who loves you.
We all do little things all the time that irritate each other because we are human. Everyone does that to everyone, and we even do that to ourselves. Have you ever thought, “why did I do that?”, or “that wasn’t smart of me to do?” Or perhaps you have done something you did or said that you later regret.
To keep peace, we need to be able to discuss those things in the right mind without it becoming an argument or a shouting match. I have the right to be irritated about things that you do; you have the right to be irritated about things that I do. It does not have to be logical. Each of us has a responsibility to not turn these things into a moral issue (unless they truly are). And to listen to the fact that they irritate and reduce them if we can. This goes both ways, and it is a perfectly normal part of any relationship, friendship, or even business contact.
We do need to consider the things that irritate us and take some serious self-introspection time on them. Am I being reasonable to allow that to irritate me? This is where logic and rationality come into play. Others cannot (and must not) break into my subconscious and force me to think in ways that make sense to them. But I am deeply responsible to ensure that the things that I allow to play and operate in my mind are reasonable and logical and adjust if they are not. We are all a work in progress, but we need to be working at making that progress for our own sake and the sake of others.
As a believer in Christ, I see that there are things I naturally think, feel, believe, and long for that are not in keeping with what is truly good, moral, or right. As I read scripture and pray and interact with people around me, God brings these things up and wants to deal with them. It is my responsibility, if I consider Him to be Lord, to accept the redirection and change. But it is not the responsibility of others to force me to comply with their interpretations. Nor is it mine to force anyone else to comply with my interpretations. Although I believe God to always be correct, I can be mistaken – even about what I think God is trying to tell me. Fortunately, our Maker has amazing patience and love for each of us individually.
If I were to create a pre-marriage workbook, I’d add a document which each person had to read through, fill out, and sign that speaks to irritability and how to handle it. Irritability is a natural occurrence – if there is none, someone is pretending to be something they are not. However, failure to handle irritability correctly can cause small cracks in an otherwise solid relationship that widen over time as they weather storms and seasons – eventually causing a structural failure. Realization that this is the norm and preparing to handle when it arises gives everyone a better chance at success. I recommend that several specific irritations are mentioned, rather than just the ‘something’.
If it irritates you that I do something, you are allowed to be irritated by that, and it does not have to be logical. It would be wrong for either of us to make this a moral issue. It does not mean that I do not care about you if I do it occasionally. It does not mean you are mentally ill or stupid if it bothers you. It simply bothers you and you need to tell me. My response should be to reduce that behavior, but I will not be successful all the time because it does not irritate me or seem logical to me. (If it did, I wouldn’t be doing it.) If I never take into account that you might get irritated, then I am likely ignoring your feelings. If I am careful some of the time, it is because I care enough to do something that seems foolish to me in order to help you with your feelings. It would not be fair if you expected me to 100% of the time take this into consideration. Neither of us has any right to blame, bully, accuse, or demean the other around this behavior.
And this goes both ways.
If it irritates me that you do something, I am allowed to be irritated by that, and it does not have to be logical. It would be wrong for either of us to make this a moral issue. It does not mean that you do not care about me if you do it occasionally. It does not mean I am mentally ill or stupid if it bothers me. It simply bothers me and I need to tell you. Your response should be to reduce that behavior, but you will not be successful all the time because it does not irritate you or seem logical to you. (If it did, you wouldn’t be doing it.) If you never take into account that I might get irritated, then you are likely ignoring my feelings. If you are careful some of the time, it is because you care enough to do something that seems foolish to you in order to help me with my feelings. It would not be fair if I expected you to 100% of the time take this into consideration. Neither of us has any right to blame, bully, accuse, or demean the other around this behavior.
Of course, there are other sorts of behaviors that are destructive or hurtful, not simply irritating. Hitting someone because we do not like what they did is unacceptable. Being unfaithful or lying is immoral. Stealing from someone is harmful and damaging. Being hypocritical needs to be discussed and stopped.
However, something like clipping toenails after dinner is irritating, but not immoral. Organizing towels, dishes, or books in a certain way might be irritating, but is not immoral. The way a person sneezes or swallows might be irritating, or cute, but never immoral.
My focus here is on what is irritating. We need to mention what irritates us to the one performing the action. The other person needs to listen instead of justifying why it is morally acceptable or logical to do (because it usually is and that fact does not make it less irritating). And then we need to both work to be less irritated, jump to fewer false moral conclusions, and try to avoid behaviors we know irritate one another. Admitting we will not be successful all the time needs to be acceptable to both sides.
Law is for the purpose of ‘cushioning’ where two diverse and valid rights collide and for maintaining a consistency whereby all can safely and in good faith pursue life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. It ought not to be to control or limit rights out of revenge or promote any one group over another through preferential treatment or exclusion. We all have the right to be who we want to be – until that collides with what someone else wants to be. I have the right to smoke until I blow it in your face unwanted. I cannot drive through red lights because others are going through the green ones. I have the right to dislike or find appalling any behavior of yours and let you know that – so long as I do it in a respectful manner, acknowledging your rights to pursue it. You have the same rights as me. These intersect with and run afoul of one another – especially as we become a more diverse society with greater access to divergent opinions and worldviews. Yet it is in that very diverseness that we find strength and can see ways around issues and reach out-of-the-box creative solutions. Don’t tread on me and I do not tread on you – which means at times we need to each curtail some of our rights to permit others’ rights. I am allowed to believe strongly what I believe, and so are you. It is not discriminatory to disagree. It is in the discourse of ideas that we come to an understanding of our uniqueness and infinite value as brothers, sisters, partners, friends, citizens of this great land.
I usually am a moderate in most of my posts because I see both sides. We do have an epidemic of violence that needs to be addressed. But it is not an epidemic of gun violence as much as it is an epidemic of a cheapening of life, an overzealous sense of personal right, an epidemic of financial and social desperation, and abuses of power. We have an epidemic of glorifying violence as a means to an end. Without addressing the root epidemic, any laws or rhetoric will be at best a bandaid over a chainsaw wound, and at worst a stripping of rights only from the law-abiding populace.
The best way to follow the scripture “If it be possible, as much as in you is, have peace with all men” (Romans 12:18) is not to silence dissidence, but to promote rational and safe dialogue. It does little good to force someone to stay with you who yearns to leave. Control incites rebellion. The burning of books does not make their contents less believed, on the contrary it entices great curiosity over what might lie therein. We all have different ideas and values – and especially in a society as varied, rich, and complex as the United States, we need to be not only cognizant of others’ notions, but in dialogue about them with each other. Some ideas, to be certain, are not promoting the general welfare – and that will come out through rational discussion. Other ideas are simply mistaken – and through clear and open dialog, the laws of physics and characteristics of human nature will become evident. Committee may be a terrible way to run anything efficiently, but it is the only way to run something equitably.
The more we know about a person – the miles they have walked in their specific shoes, the rationale they have for what they hold to be true – the more we can see that they are not the enemy at all, rather a brother or sister with a different perspective we likely can also learn a thing or two from.
Asking the citizens of the great land of the United States to remain united. For peaceful discourse as this election wraps up and as we settle in to another four years with leaders barely elected. Remember that we really do need one another; burning bridges, gloating, or castigating will not help anyone or change any hearts or create any space we can build anything in. People have reasons for what they believe and accept ideologies and do what they do, even when it does not make sense to someone else. But it might take a good bit of tough listening to hear through the noise and know the heart. We need to work toward unity, not furthering the divides by pouring in salt to wounds – we need connective tissue to grow, not scar tissue. Our nation will not fail or succeed because of who is elected – it will fail or succeed because of what we as neighbors, citizens, families, friends, and acquaintances do to set aside enmity and find common ground for peace.
I have seen racism. I have seen bullying in childhood as well as in adult life. I have also been a victim of underlying racism and xenophobia while living as a foreigner in Japan for nearly a decade. The ‘gaijin’ concept in Japan is certainly systemic. I was questioned by the police on my relationships and told I had no place in the country regularly as I walked to and from the train station. At other times, mothers scooped their kids up and took them inside when I walked by their house. People would refuse to sit next to me on the train unless they had a rude request or a curious fascination. Some places flat out told me that their restaurant or clothing store was for natives only, and kindly redirected me to the tourist district.
Some of the things that went on are still hard to believe. This behavior was directed against me as a foreigner – systemic, pervasive, part of the underlying culture. To be a foreigner was to be suspect, assumed to be up to no good, distrusted, hated by some as messing with the cultural way of life by my very presence. It is a subconscious bias, woven into the history taught in elementary schools, the tv commercials, the pop culture, the news. It is subtle, ubiquitous, and ‘common sense’ among the general populace. That is what systemic means.
I would concede there are places in our great country of the United States where a culture of racist belief is firmly entrenched, but not everywhere nor to the same extent. I would also need to concede that as a white guy growing up in a predominantly white community between the ages of 10 and 20, there is likely a great deal I was insulated from or unaware of. Your experience with racism or bigotry may certainly differ.
I have seen it raise its ugly head in the way news is presented or the accused treated by authorities. But not everywhere and again, it is subtle. Most folks, if accused, would not believe it, would not believe they are guilty of being a part of it. Some victims have bought into it, assuming this is the way things are.
However, even the tiniest mote of such a scapegoating and xenophobic and demeaning attitude (whether subconscious or intentional) is unacceptable in our nation. It poisons the well. It clouds the freedoms we have declared as immutable for every person by our Constitution and Declaration of Independence.
In many other places, such behavior and thought are encouraged as a means to solidify the ruling class or national genetic heritage. But the USA is founded on the belief that humanity has a set of common human rights, that governance should be by the people – not by a ruling class, and that all people are created equal. A racist mentality goes strongly counter to the ‘why’ of our existence as a nation. It is, therefore, more apt to secrecy and more publicly hated when unearthed. It comes out as a big deal and gets used by politicians of all designations to point fingers at the other … interestingly, another type of xenophobism, and deeply hypocritical at that.
Although I am still a bit skeptical of a national, systemic racist bias – or at least an organized and intentional one – I do, of course, see even intense racism in specific cities and communities. I am also aware of several inherent biases I am personally working to overcome. Interestingly, none of them surround the color of one’s skin – but that’s just how I was personally brought up. I am not any better or worse than anyone. Everyone has inherent and often unconscious biases, stemming from personal experience as much as upbringing. Awareness is key to combating this. I highly recommend taking several bias tests at Project Implicit® from Harvard University for some curious introspection.
Any racism is intolerable. Any bias starts to fray the very fabric of what we are about as a nation and society. We all need one another. That is not to say we are all exactly the same – otherwise, we would not need one another. We need diversity exactly because we are all diverse. The key is that no one has lesser or greater value, potential, or worth – but we are each a unique and inestimably valuable work of art. My faith tells me that the Creator intentionally made us all unique. Divisions such as male or female or somewhere in-between are all a part of who we are. Skin color and heritage and language and culture are all a rich contribution to the larger society in which we each live, breathe, and have our being. We need each other; we need peaceful discourse over our differences and over our different mindsets to enrich society as a whole.
The United States is a grand experiment toward equality from its inception. Not a perfect one, by any means, but one with grand and sweeping ideals and lofty goals. Reading our founding documents is inspiring. Government of, by, and for the people. All people created equally. Working together for a common defense and welfare. Noble ideas way ahead of their time.
Since our humble beginings, we have matured some – disavowed slavery, passed laws to ensure equality in pay and opportunity, and granted universal suffrage for all citizenry. But not without terrible growing pains – and there is certainly a great deal more left for us to do. Humanity will always have a distrust for the unfamiliar or unique while at the same time curiosity and fascination. Our founding principles demand we continue seeking justice and equality and provisions of equity regardless of how difficult it may be – while refraining from revenge. Revenge merely moves the weight of bias and racism to a new victim instead of removing it.
What we need is systemic acceptance. We need the arguably Voltairean concept of “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.” The understanding that we are all in the same sinking ship and need to work together to keep even partially afloat. We desperately need each other – especially when we disagree or are different in some way or have an out-of-the-box thought. That is the benefit of our great land, we the people are an eclectic mix and have the legal right to be different and speak out about our differences. We bring various ideas and unique perspectives together in ways that few others can.
Yet we are still wrestling through the struggle actually to achieve the intended and declared goals of our founding. This is not because our forefathers were racist or intolerant bigots – it is because we are people, humans on a journey, imperfect and in need of both grace and deep repentance and change. We need to overcome and stand alongside the persecuted and privileged alike, aligning ourselves with the motto on the Statue of Liberty, the ‘Mother of Exiles’ – gatepost to entry to our Land of the Free…
“Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.Send these,
the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!
Such are all who chose to come here; yearning to be free, deemed wretched by our homelands, not fitting in, seeking rest from the tempest – regardless of (and often due to) the color of our skin or language or culture or race. Undeniably, this is how we owe to treat those who were brought here without choice or found themselves in our midst as well.
Systemic inclusion, systemic acceptance needs to be our cry and our daily action as written on our founding code. As difficult as it may seem. Bringing about a Land that rings true to the goals and dreams of our inception. An ideal that echoes in the words of Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, a few excerpts I will post here in closing for your pondering, although I recommend the entirety of this great message …
“When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir. This note was a promise that all men, yes, black men as well as white men, would be guaranteed the “unalienable Rights” of “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”…
And so even though we face the difficulties of today and tomorrow, I still have a dream. It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream.I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.”…
And if America is to be a great nation, this must become true.…
And when this happens, and when we allow freedom ring, when we let it ring from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day when all of God’s children, black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual:Free at last! Free at last!Thank God Almighty, we are free at last!”
Many ‘smart’ kids never learn how to learn. At first, it comes too easy, and then when challenge comes, they do not know what to do. Learning how to conceptualize multiple solutions and then implement one without decision paralysis (and especially letting them know this means multiple iterations until the best solution is found) would help a lot of people.
False expectations on brain power are no match for hard work and persistence. It is not those with better tools that are successful in life – but those who put what they do have to best use. It is a good thing to be intelligent. To like thinking. To be capable of understanding things easily. To connect ideas out in out of the box and creative ways. However, unless these abilities can be harnessed by the possessor, they are as useless as an unplugged super computer or sportscar without fuel.
Cultivate intelligence and a love of learning, but compliment kids on their effort, especially repeated effort until success. It is a better result to get a ‘B’ in math and truly understand the concepts and be able to apply them in real-word situations, than to get an ‘A’ on the examples and textbook problems on a standardized test.
I am deeply saddened at the attacks that have become so seemingly commonplace these days. Yet after living in Japan, I know that humankind will find a way to perpetrate horrible things without guns. Drive-by sarin gas attacks, bombs on the subway, and a lot of knife killings (including one where a guy broke into an elementary school and sliced up a classroom of kids before taking his own life). I’m all for better controls and checks on guns – but don’t think a ban would do much more than change the weapons of choice, or only give those who already disobey the law an advantage. Pipebombs, ricin, pressure cookers, explosives made from manure that took out an entire building, these have all been used in the not-too-distant past here in the US. We need to address underlying social, psychological, and spiritual issues much more than pass a few laws.
These attacks cause such tragedy and injustice. Especially because these were not carried out by some external power seeking to tear our society apart, but by citizens, some with criminal intent, others with delusions. The weapons used were whatever was expedient, and guns are ubiquitous, on sale at grocery stores. However, if guns were not so readily accessible, other options do abound. Daily items such as manure, turpentine, chlorine bleach, gasoline, LPG, kitchen knives, axes, chainsaws, fireworks, motor vehicles – all are useable for destructive purpose. Broadly banning anything that could possibly be used to cause harm is not the long term way to fix our problems.
Many have a deep distrust in our institutions, our police, our seats of power. We have removed God and faith and therefore, a reason for acting sacrificially of personal rights. And we have enshrined violence as the way to deal with frustrations and issues not immediately conforming to our felt needs.
Dealing with these three failings (and others) will have far more impact on the safety and solidarity of our nation than merely passing laws about a specific type of weapon. Although such laws may help in the short term. They would be but a band-aid over a chainsaw wound to the chest.
Failure is not to be admired, rather not wasting failure is to be admired.
– Christopher M. Kelly
Failure does not need to be the end. We all try things and fail, it is one of the main ways we learn and grow, and arguably it is the only way we attain success. Failure and getting back up and trying again are the stuff of epic legends and blockbuster movies.
However, espousing the notion that one’s employees should be able to fail and learn is easier than implementing company policy that does so.
Edmondson ACLearning from failure in health care: frequent opportunities, pervasive barriersBMJ Quality & Safety 2004;13:ii3-ii9